Multinational Manufacturing – Le Pocher Volvo Penta http://lepochervolvopenta.com/ Thu, 24 Nov 2022 01:30:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3 https://lepochervolvopenta.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/icon-4.png Multinational Manufacturing – Le Pocher Volvo Penta http://lepochervolvopenta.com/ 32 32 Reinventing Global Connections EJINSIGHT – ejinsight.com https://lepochervolvopenta.com/reinventing-global-connections-ejinsight-ejinsight-com/ Thu, 24 Nov 2022 01:30:00 +0000 https://lepochervolvopenta.com/reinventing-global-connections-ejinsight-ejinsight-com/ Europe is facing disruptions in its energy supply. The Middle East and Africa are grappling with grain shortages. And pretty much everyone is struggling to get their hands on semiconductors. As disruptions to the flow of vital commodities become more common, economies and businesses have important choices to make. The most fundamental seems to be […]]]>

Europe is facing disruptions in its energy supply. The Middle East and Africa are grappling with grain shortages. And pretty much everyone is struggling to get their hands on semiconductors. As disruptions to the flow of vital commodities become more common, economies and businesses have important choices to make. The most fundamental seems to be whether to withdraw from global integration or reinvent it.

For many, the temptation to retreat can be strong. From Russia’s war on Ukraine to the Sino-American rivalry, the global order is increasingly contested, and when value chains are global, a single disruption can ripple across the planet. But, as we show in a new research paper, exiting these value chains would not be as easy as one might assume.

For decades, the world has sought rapid and comprehensive economic integration – and with good reason. By enabling greater specialization and economies of scale, global value chains have improved efficiency, lowered prices, and increased the range and quality of goods and services available. By supporting economic growth, it has boosted incomes and employment – ​​but not for all – helping to lift people out of poverty.

With integration came interdependence. As we show in our article, no region today is close to self-sufficiency. Every major region of the world imports more than 25% of at least one major resource or manufactured good.

In many cases, the numbers are much higher. Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, Eastern Europe and Central Asia import more than 50% of the electronic products they need. The European Union imports more than 50% of its energy resources. The Asia-Pacific region imports more than 25% of its energy resources. Even North America, which has fewer highly dependent areas, depends on imports of resources and manufactured goods.

This undoubtedly generates risks, especially when it comes to goods whose production is highly concentrated. For example, most of the world’s lithium and graphite – both of which are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries – are largely mined from three or fewer countries. Natural graphite is highly concentrated not because of reserves, but because over 80% is refined in China.

Similarly, the Democratic Republic of the Congo extracts 69% of the world’s cobalt, Indonesia represents 32% of the world’s nickel and Chile produces 28% of the world’s copper. A disruption of supply from any of these sources would have far-reaching consequences.

The question is whether countries – and businesses – can mitigate these risks without giving up the myriad benefits of global trade. Some are already embracing diversification. Many consumer electronics companies have expanded their manufacturing footprint in India and Vietnam to reduce their reliance on China and access emerging markets. Similarly, the US, EU, South Korea, China and Japan have all announced measures to increase domestic production of semiconductors. Although semiconductors account for less than 10% of total trade, products directly or indirectly dependent on them account for around 65% of all goods exports.

But diversification can take time and often requires a large initial investment. Minerals – among the most concentrated commodities in the global system – are a good example. As the International Energy Agency has pointed out, the development of new deposits of critical minerals has historically taken more than 16 years on average.

It’s not just about developing new mines; countries also need to build processing capacity and find workers with the necessary skills. And all of this must be done in a way that mitigates the considerable environmental impact of mining and processing.

Innovation can enable players to circumvent these obstacles. Already, efforts are being made to develop technologies that rely less on natural graphite, and electric vehicle makers are experimenting with approaches that use less cobalt, if at all. Faced with rising palladium prices, the multinational chemical company BASF has developed a new catalyst technology allowing partial substitution by platinum.

Another way to build resilience can be to change our approach to sourcing. Businesses can work with each other and with governments, through public-private partnerships, to leverage their joint purchasing power, bolster their supplies of vital goods and help build more sustainable economies.

Models of this cooperation are already emerging. The Canada Growth Fund aims to use public funds to attract private capital to accelerate the deployment of technologies needed to decarbonize the economy, including increasing domestic production of critical materials like zinc, cobalt and rare earth elements. And the First Movers Coalition – comprising more than 50 private companies around the world – has pledged to use its collective buying power to create markets for innovative clean technologies in eight hard-to-reduce sectors.

Such strategies show that we can mitigate risk and build economic resilience without abandoning the interdependence that has lifted more than a billion people out of poverty in recent decades. Rather than trying to withdraw from the global economy, we must reinvent it.

Copyright : Project Syndicate
— Contact us at [email protected]

Olivia White, Jonathan Woetzel

Olivia White, Senior Partner in McKinsey & Company’s San Francisco office, is Director of the McKinsey Global Institute. Jonathan Woetzel, McKinsey Senior Partner, is the McKinsey Cities Special Initiative Lead and a McKinsey Trustee

]]>
Vietnam arms itself for service in US chip war against China – Asia Times https://lepochervolvopenta.com/vietnam-arms-itself-for-service-in-us-chip-war-against-china-asia-times/ Wed, 16 Nov 2022 05:00:53 +0000 https://lepochervolvopenta.com/vietnam-arms-itself-for-service-in-us-chip-war-against-china-asia-times/ Samsung Electronics CEO met with Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh and announcement a $850 million investment to manufacture semiconductor components in Thai Nguyen province on August 5, 2022. The investment will make Vietnam one of only four countries – alongside South Korea, China and the United States – to produce semiconductors for the world’s […]]]>

Samsung Electronics CEO met with Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh and announcement a $850 million investment to manufacture semiconductor components in Thai Nguyen province on August 5, 2022.

The investment will make Vietnam one of only four countries – alongside South Korea, China and the United States – to produce semiconductors for the world’s largest memory chip maker. Vietnam’s selection of more developed locations speaks volumes about the country’s growing importance in the semiconductor value chain.

Vietnam is not new to the semiconductor industry. The country’s first semiconductor factory, Z181, was established in 1979 to produce and export semiconductor components to the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War.

]]>
Africa: why the biggest African companies are supporting the fight against climate change https://lepochervolvopenta.com/africa-why-the-biggest-african-companies-are-supporting-the-fight-against-climate-change/ Fri, 11 Nov 2022 05:14:10 +0000 https://lepochervolvopenta.com/africa-why-the-biggest-african-companies-are-supporting-the-fight-against-climate-change/ The CEOs of 55 African companies with a combined revenue of $150 billion on November 9, 2022, issued a statement pledging to climate action. The United Nations Global Compact helped rally these companies to issue the joint statement. In an interview with Kingsley Ighobor of Africa Renewal at COP27, UN Under-Secretary General and CEO of […]]]>

The CEOs of 55 African companies with a combined revenue of $150 billion on November 9, 2022, issued a statement pledging to climate action. The United Nations Global Compact helped rally these companies to issue the joint statement. In an interview with Kingsley Ighobor of Africa Renewal at COP27, UN Under-Secretary General and CEO of United Nations Global Compact Sanda Ojiambo discussed, among other issues, the effects of climate change in Africa and why a growing number of African businesses are taking climate action. These are excerpts from the interview.

Why should African businesses care about climate change?

African businesses need to care about climate change for a number of reasons: First, the continent contributes the least to climate change but suffers the most from its effects. African CEOs tell us their companies are feeling the impact of the climate crisis in terms of input costs.

Second, it is still difficult to access finance related to renewable energy.

And third, because we are aware that climate catastrophe will continue to have the greatest impact on the African continent, business leaders fear that the present and future of business are at stake.

One of the things that resonated very strongly in September when we had the Global Business Initiative for Africa is that there is so much belief in Africa as a business and tourism destination. ‘investment ; it is important that we take proactive steps now to ensure that businesses thrive.

About 55 CEOs with revenues of around $150 billion and employing nearly a million workers today released a statement engage in the fight for the climate. What are the highlights of their statement?

Let me highlight why this is such an important step for us in the UN Global Compact. This is the first time that the private sector in North, South, East and West Africa has come together around the same issue. Thanks to the convening power we have as the UN, we have been able to bring this group together.

The statement covers two things: first, it adds to the voice call for responsibilitycalling on global actors to deliver on their commitments to ensure Africa’s climate sustainability.

Second, it is about their [CEOs] own commitment towards climate action within their companies, within their industries and for the continent.

So it’s basically a two-part piece. Let’s hold people accountable, but we’ll also do our part.

Let me highlight why this is such an important step for us in the UN Global Compact. This is the first time that the private sector in North, South, East and West Africa has come together around the same issue. Thanks to the convening power we have as the UN, we have been able to bring this group together.

How do these African companies connect their climate work to what their governments are doing?

Very important. Many of the business leaders present at COP27 are indeed part of government delegations because, as you know, these delegations are made up of both private and public sector representatives. Thus, companies contribute to nationally determined contributions. It is very clear that the private sector plays a role in the economic development of these countries.

Many of these companies have partners overseas, some of which are large multinationals. Are they able to engage these multinationals to get involved in climate action on the continent?

Let me turn the question around. I’ll tell you what we hear from most global companies. They say sometimes they’re not so sure what happens down the line because they don’t have full visibility into their supply chains. And that is their primary concern.

You can commit to taking climate action at your headquarters, but you don’t know what’s happening with the subsidiaries, as many of them are indigenous national companies.

So if anything they [multinationals] have to take care of their own supply chains and they want to be sure that the commitments they make at head office hold throughout the supply chain.

What do you think of the “just transition” because the business leaders mentioned it in their statement?

It depends on which side of the table we are sitting. What is “fair” or “equitable” depends on what you want to focus on. We see that there are real key business and economic decisions about what a just transition is.

I hear from many African business leaders and heads of state – people recognize that we are stopping exploiting fossil fuels and moving to green and renewable technologies. I don’t think that’s a disputed principle.

The thing is, it’s not that simple because of the high cost of financing renewables. And some countries may be in the midst of economic transitions to middle-income manufacturing economies. I think it can be fair and equitable when we understand the barriers to implementation.

The statement [by African CEOs] covers two things: first, it adds to the voice call for responsibility, calling on global actors to deliver on their commitments to ensure Africa’s climate sustainability. Second, it is about their [CEOs] own commitment towards climate action within their companies, within their industries and for the continent.

From the statement, it appears that African CEOs want a constructive and gradual divestment from fossil fuels.

What I do know is that private sector leaders have said that if financing and capital were available, it would be much easier to make these transitions. Business leaders tell me they don’t want to continue down a path that isn’t sustainable for their business and their country. What they are asking for is equitable access to the resources that will enable the transitions.

This is an objective of COP27 because Africa demands much more access to financing.

Which is very clear, and I heard this from the UN Secretary General [Antonio Guterres]is that there is a need to reform the global financial architecture.

We talk about access at the national level for savings, but in other discussions it is about access to finance for adaptation, resilience, etc. for the people. I think for African economies, it’s adaptation and resilience financing that really changes how businesses can build resilience.

How difficult was it to get all these CEOs to agree to adopt 27% renewable energy by 2030, given that they all have different types of businesses and their individual transitions may not proceed at the same pace?

Interestingly, when we first had a meeting and decided we wanted to do this [issue a statement]we actually said to the leaders, “let us know what you think is the most pressing emergency”.

The consensus was on the climate. It was very easy and quick. I think there was recognition that an important climate conference was being held on the continent, as well as the important role that climate action plays in business.

Now that the statement is out, what next?

Now that the statement is out, business leaders will be held to account. We asked them to lead climate action within their own companies and industries.

They will continue to build momentum around climate action.

Fifty-five companies have signed the declaration. This is not the end point. We want more companies to commit to climate action, follow the principles of the Global Compact, and ultimately be able to drive this change within their industries and countries.